Effects of different levels of CT iterative reconstruction on low-contrast detectability and radiation dose in patients of different sizes: an anthropomorphic phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify the maintenance of low-contrast detectability at different CT dose reduction levels, in patients of different sizes, as a consequence of the application of iterative reconstruction at different strengths combined with tube current modulation. METHODS: Anthropomorphic abdominal phantoms of two sizes (small and large) were imaged at a fixed noise with iterative algorithm ASIR-V percentages in the range between 0 and 70% and corresponding dose reductions in the range of 0-83%. A total of 1400 images with and without liver low-contrast simulated lesions were evaluated by five radiologists, using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) paradigm and evaluating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The human observer results were then compared with AUC obtained with a channelized Hotelling observer (CHO). CNR values were also calculated. RESULTS: For the small phantom, the AUC values lie between 0.90 and 0.93 for human evaluations of images acquired without iterative reconstruction, with 30% ASIR-V and with 50% ASIR-V. The AUC decreased significantly to 0.81 (p = 0.0001) at 70% ASIR-V. The CHO results were in coherence with human observer scores. Also, similar results were observed for the large size phantom. CNR values were stable for the different ASIR-V percentages. CONCLUSIONS: The iterative algorithm maintained the low-contrast detectability up to a dose reduction of about 70%, following application of a 50% ASIR-V combined with automatic tube current modulation, regardless of the phantom size. At further dose reductions using greater iterative percentages, a significant decrease in detectability was observed.

Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose reduction during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) after the reconfiguration of a Philips AlluraXper FD20 X-ray system. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2015, we implemented a low-dose protocol (Eco dose) increasing the filtration with 1 mm of Al and 0.1 of Cu on both fluoroscopy and fluorography and halving the frames per second in fluoroscopy. The switch was complemented by hybrid operating room staff education and training in radiation protection. We compared two samples of 50 patients treated before the switch (normal dose) with 50 patients treated after the switch (Eco dose). Procedures were categorized into two different grades of complexity, standard and complex, intended as fenestrated/chimney/snorkel and EVAR plus additional embolization to prevent endoleak type II. We evaluated patient demographics, Air Kerma (AK), dose area product (DAP), and procedural data (fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and iodinated contrast). Staff radiation dose was measured with film badge dosimeter on C-arm. RESULTS: The Eco-dose protocol witnessed a DAP reduction of 53% in standard EVARs and of 57% in complex EVARs and an AK reduction of 45% in standard and 57% in complex EVAR. The image quality in 2016 was perceived acceptable, as proven by the fact that fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and contrast medium volumes did not have to be increased. We achieved a reduction in staff dose of 25.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Optimized angiographic system setting significantly reduced the radiation dose both to the patients and to the staff assuring safe EVAR procedures.

Evaluation of a commercial automatic treatment planning system for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments.

PURPOSE: Automated treatment planning is a new frontier in radiotherapy. The Auto-Planning module of the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (TPS) was evaluated for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments. METHODS: Ten cases were included in the study. Six plans were generated for each case by four medical physics experts. The first two planned with Pinnacle TPS, both with manual module (MP) and Auto-Planning one (AP). The other two physicists generated two plans with Monaco TPS (VM). Treatment plan comparisons were then carried on the various dosimetric parameters of target and organs at risk, monitor units, number of segments, plan complexity metrics and human resource planning time. The user dependency of Auto-Planning was also tested and the plans were evaluated by a trained physician. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (Anova test) were observed for spinal cord doses, plan average beam irregularity, number of segments, monitor units and human planning time. The Fisher-Hayter test applied to these parameters showed significant statistical differences between AP e MP for spinal cord doses and human planning time; between MP and VM for monitor units, number of segments and plan irregularity; for all those between AP and VM. The two plans created by different planners with AP were similar to each other. CONCLUSIONS: The plans created with Auto-Planning were comparable to the manually generated plans. The time saved in planning enables the planner to commit more resources to more complex cases. The independence of the planner enables to standardize plan quality.

Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Impact on Dose Reduction and Image Quality in Body Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on dose reduction and image quality of the new iterative reconstruction technique: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V). METHODS: Fifty consecutive oncologic patients acted as case controls undergoing during their follow-up a computed tomography scan both with ASIR and ASIR-V. Each study was analyzed in a double-blinded fashion by 2 radiologists. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses of image quality were conducted. RESULTS: Computed tomography scanner radiation output was 38% (29%-45%) lower (P < 0.0001) for the ASIR-V examinations than for the ASIR ones. The quantitative image noise was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) for ASIR-V. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V had a higher performance for the subjective image noise (P = 0.01 for 5 mm and P = 0.009 for 1.25 mm), the other parameters (image sharpness, diagnostic acceptability, and overall image quality) being similar (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V is a new iterative reconstruction technique that has the potential to provide image quality equal to or greater than ASIR, with a dose reduction around 40%.

Calculation of tumour and normal tissue biological effective dose in 90Y liver radioembolization with different dosimetric methods.

PURPOSE: Radioembolization with 90Y microspheres is an effective treatment for unresectable liver tumours. Two types of microspheres are available: resin (SIR-Spheres®) and glass (Theraspheres®). The aim of this study is to compare biological effective dose (BED) values obtained with three different dosimetric methods. METHODS: 29 HCC patients were included in this study: 15 were treated with resin(mean injected activity 1.5GBq, range 0.8-2.7GBq) and 14 with glass microspheres (2.6GBq, range 1.3-4.1GBq). Average doses to tumours and normal liver tissues were calculated with AAPM, multi-compartmental MIRD and Voxel-based methods and consequently the BED values were obtained. Planar images were used for the AAPM method: 99mTc-MAA SPECT-CT attenuation and scatter corrected images (resin) and 99m Tc-MAA SPECT attenuation corrected (glass) were employed for the other two methods. RESULTS: Regardless of type of microspheres, both for tumours and normal liver tissues, no significant statistical differences were found between MIRD and Voxel for both doses and BED values. Conversely AAPM gave discordant results with respect to the other two methods (Mann-Whitney p-values⩽0.01). For resin spheres the calculated tumour-to-normal tissue ratios on planar images were on average 14 times greater than those obtained on SPECT-CT images, while they were 4 times greater on glass. A linear correlation was observed between MIRD and Voxel BEDs. CONCLUSIONS: The AAPM method appears to be less precise for absorbed dose and BED estimation, while MIRD and voxel based dosimetry are more confident each other.

Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate various approaches for assessing patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT (CBCT), by the use of thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements in anthropomorphic phantoms, a Monte Carlo based dose calculation software, and different dose indicators as presently defined. METHODS: Dose evaluations were performed on a CBCT Elekta XVI (Elekta, Crawley, UK) for different protocols and anatomical regions. The first part of the study focuses on using pcxmc software (pcxmc 2.0, STUK, Helsinki, Finland) for calculating organ doses, adapting the input parameters to simulate the exposure geometry, and beam dose distribution in an appropriate way. The calculated doses were compared to readouts of TLDs placed in an anthropomorphic Rando phantom. After this validation, the software was used for analyzing organ dose variability associated with patients' differences in size and gender. At the same time, various dose indicators were evaluated: kerma area product (KAP), cumulative air-kerma at the isocenter (Kair), cone-beam dose index, and central cumulative dose. The latter was evaluated in a single phantom and in a stack of three adjacent computed tomography dose index phantoms. Based on the different dose indicators, a set of coefficients was calculated to estimate organ doses for a range of patient morphologies, using their equivalent diameters. RESULTS: Maximum organ doses were about 1 mGy for head and neck and 25 mGy for chest and pelvis protocols. The differences between pcxmc and TLDs doses were generally below 10% for organs within the field of view and approximately 15% for organs at the boundaries of the radiation beam. When considering patient size and gender variability, differences in organ doses up to 40% were observed especially in the pelvic region; for the organs in the thorax, the maximum differences ranged between 20% and 30%. Phantom dose indexes provided better correlation with organ doses than Kair and KAP, with average ratios ranging between 0.9 and 1.1 and variations for different organs and protocols below 20%. The triple phantom setup allowed us to take into account scatter dose contributions, but nonetheless, the correlation with the evaluated organ doses was not improved with this method. CONCLUSIONS: The simulation of rotational geometry and of asymmetric beam distribution by means of pcxmc 2.0 enabled us to determine patient organ doses depending on weight, height and gender. Alternatively, the measurement of an in phantom dose indicator combined with proper correction coefficients can be a useful tool for a first dose estimation of in-field organs. The data and coefficients provided in this study can be applied to any patient undergoing a scan by an Elekta XVI equipment.

Aortic CT angiography dose reduction: investigation of optimal noise index and iterative algorithm strength in combination with low kV.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to optimize an aorta angiographic CT protocol, by investigating the best combination of tube current modulation, iterative algorithm strength and kV reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anthropomorphic phantoms of three sizes were imaged by CT with different values of noise index, of iterative algorithm ASIR percentages and kV in the range 80-120. Quantitative noise and contrast noise ratios were evaluated at different phantom locations. Three radiologists assessed the subjective image quality by comparing the image series with the one acquired with the reference protocol (120 kV, slice thickness 0.625, noise index 28, ASIR 40 %). RESULTS: Although the highest CNR values were obtained for the 80 kV acquisitions, qualitative scores were higher for 100 and 120 kV at the same noise index. An optimized protocol was established with a NI of 39.2, ASIR 60%, 100 kV for small- and medium-sized patients and 120 kV for large-sized patients, with a dose reduction of 47%. CONCLUSION: When different dose reduction parameters are available, anthropomorphic phantoms of different sizes help to find the optimal combination. For aorta studies, 100 kV with relative high values of noise indexes and iterative levels provides the best balance between dose reduction and image quality.

A GPU Simulation Tool for Training and Optimisation in 2D Digital X-Ray Imaging.

Conventional radiology is performed by means of digital detectors, with various types of technology and different performance in terms of efficiency and image quality. Following the arrival of a new digital detector in a radiology department, all the staff involved should adapt the procedure parameters to the properties of the detector, in order to achieve an optimal result in terms of correct diagnostic information and minimum radiation risks for the patient. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a software capable of simulating a digital X-ray imaging system, using graphics processing unit computing. All radiological image components were implemented in this application: an X-ray tube with primary beam, a virtual patient, noise, scatter radiation, a grid and a digital detector. Three different digital detectors (two digital radiography and a computed radiography systems) were implemented. In order to validate the software, we carried out a quantitative comparison of geometrical and anthropomorphic phantom simulated images with those acquired. In terms of average pixel values, the maximum differences were below 15%, while the noise values were in agreement with a maximum difference of 20%. The relative trends of contrast to noise ratio versus beam energy and intensity were well simulated. Total calculation times were below 3 seconds for clinical images with pixel size of actual dimensions less than 0.2 mm. The application proved to be efficient and realistic. Short calculation times and the accuracy of the results obtained make this software a useful tool for training operators and dose optimisation studies.

Prostate brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds: radiation protection issues.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy for prostate cancer by means of permanently implanted 125I sources is a well established procedure. An increasing number of patients all over the world are treated with this modality. When the technique was introduced at our institution, radiation protection issues relative to this technique were investigated in order to comply with international recommendations and national regulations. Particular attention was paid to the need for patient shielding after discharge from hospital. METHODS: The effective and equivalent doses to personnel related to implantation, the effective dose to patient relatives as computed by a developed algorithm, the air kerma strength values for the radioactive sources certified by the manufacturer compared with those measured by a well chamber, and the effectiveness of lead gloves in shielding the hands were evaluated. RESULTS: The effective dose to the bodies of personnel protected by a lead apron proved to be negligible. The mean equivalent doses to the physician's hands was 420 microSv for one implant; the technician's hands received 65 microSv. The mean air kerma rate measured at the anterior skin surface of the patient who had received an implant was 55 microGy/h (range, 10-115) and was negligible with lead protection. The measured and certified air kerma strength for125I seeds in RAPID Strand corresponded within a margin of +/- 5%. The measured attenuation by lead gloves in operative conditions was about 80%. We also defined the recommendations to be given to the patient at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure risks related to brachytherapy with 125I to operators and public are limited. However, alternation of operators should be considered to minimize exposure. Patient-related measurements should verify the dose rate around the patient to evaluate the need for shielding and to define appropriate radiation protection recommendations.

Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality and radiation dose of a conventional film-screen system and a digital system with amorphous selenium detectors in the study of the chest, by verifying overall performance and exposure levels for the main chest structures in patients of different sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analogic system (Chest-Changer, Dupont, Day-light model 1000) and a digital system (Directray Rad 1000C, Hologic) were tested on a total of 1000 patients randomly assigned to one of two groups of 500 subjects. The patients were further subdivided according to BMI (Body Mass Index). Image quality was determined by two chest radiologists who evaluated eight anatomical structures. The entrance surface dose (skin-dose), calculated based on the exposure parameters, was taken as the patient dose. RESULTS: Mean dose delivered was very similar for both techniques in the PA view (0.28 mGy), but it was greater in the LL projections obtained with the digital system (1.20 mGy versus 0.83 mGy). The highest overall scores were assigned to 43% and 23.2% analogic radiograms and 64% and 70.2% digital radiograms, for the PA and LL projections respectively. The scores assigned to the various anatomical structures confirmed the better performance of the digital system in almost all of the regions considered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean quality of radiograms is definitely higher with the digital system, in particular in the LL projections, where the higher patient doses are counterbalanced by fewer repeated scans. The greater level of exposure in the digital system appears nonetheless tolerable on account of the greater informativeness and therefore diagnostic gain and also considering the possibilities for improving the system.

[Patient dose evaluation and optimization of uropoietic multiphasic multislice CT examination].

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to optimize acquisition data during multislice multiphasic CT examination of the renal excretory system in order to reduce patient effective dose without deterioration of the imaging quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the aid of two dedicated software programmes we evaluated the patient effective dose during both multislice multiphasic CT examination of the renal excretory system and excretory urography. With the CT acquisition protocol, images of a test object (Helical CT phantom, CIRS) were examined by two expert radiologists to assess the number of visible inserted test images. Other scans of the test object were then obtained utilizing decreased tube current intensity; among these that with minor information loss was identified. Patient effective dose was measured utilizing correspondent acquisition data. RESULTS: Patient effective dose during multiphasic multislice CT examination before optimization (280 mA tube current intensity) was 22.9 mSv for males and 31.1 mSv for females; after optimization it was 19.6 mSv and 26.7 mSv, respectively, with a 14% decrease. Patient effective dose during CT direct phase before optimization was 8.9 mSv for males and 12.8 mSv for females, after optimization 7.6 mSv and 11 mSv with a 15% decrease. The absorbed dose for males is lower because the females gonads are completely included in the primary CT beam, whereas the testicles are hit by diffuse radiation only. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: During CT direct phase the patient absorbed dose is 1.45 for males and 1.9 for females (1.2 and 1.6 respectively after optimization) higher than that absorbed during intravenous pyelography; the absorbed dose of a complete multiphasic CT examination is 3.7 for males and 4.6 for females (3.2 and 3.9 respectively after optimization) higher than that absorbed during intravenous pyelography. Such dosimetric data may be justified by diagnostic advantages in stone assessment, especially in males, and by the fact that multislice CT may unify different diagnostic tools such as intravenous pyelography, axial CT and angiography, thereby simplifying the entire diagnostic protocol. As far as exposure is concerned radiologists should follow the optimizing principle referred to each clinical query, bearing in mind that diagnostic accuracy is more important than the simple iconographic aspect.